.

General Topics

Moderators: JohnV, Arron, garym

.

Postby Buzznerd123 on November 5th, 2015, 9:28 am

.
Last edited by Buzznerd123 on May 1st, 2016, 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Buzznerd123
Selfless giver of time
Selfless giver of time
 
Posts: 114
Joined: January 5th, 2014, 2:37 pm

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Postby crotwich on November 5th, 2015, 10:59 am

Elementary statistics says c). 8) In 10000 people, less than 1 has the disease, but the test will produce approx. 100 false positives. Hence, the probability that a random positive actually has the disease is smaller than 1/100=1%.

BTW, welcome back Buzz! :)
crotwich
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 58
Joined: July 31st, 2014, 5:33 am
Location: Europe

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Postby Buzznerd123 on November 9th, 2015, 2:15 pm

.
Last edited by Buzznerd123 on May 1st, 2016, 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Buzznerd123
Selfless giver of time
Selfless giver of time
 
Posts: 114
Joined: January 5th, 2014, 2:37 pm

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Postby misterjuanperalta on November 9th, 2015, 6:01 pm

So of the up to 14% of BFS'ers that developed MND (average over 45 years of age), how many false positives could there have been?
misterjuanperalta
Saint
Saint
 
Posts: 515
Joined: August 21st, 2014, 7:27 am

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Postby crotwich on November 10th, 2015, 8:45 am

misterjuanperalta wrote:So of the up to 14% of BFS'ers that developed MND (average over 45 years of age), how many false positives could there have been?


No one can give you answer to tihs question and I have never seen a study which says that (up to) 14% of BFS'ers developed ALS/MND. Can you give us the reference?
Regarding these "progression studies", AFAIK:

1. There is a study written in Eisen-Krieger's book which says that within 258 ALS patients, 14% of them presented only with fasciculations. The mean time interval between developing fasciculation and other deficits was 7.6 months (range 3-11 mo).
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=21467&p=161687#p1616872 (5th post).

2. Earlier Eisen's study showed that 6.7% of his 312 ALS patients had fasciculation as an inital sypmtom. The mean time interval between developing fasciculation and other deficits was 7.2 months (range 2.4-13.6 mo). The authors of the original Mayo's wrote a reply, saying that this didn't match their experience, since all of their ALS patients who had fasciculation (as the first symptom) always had EMG abnormalities.
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=248&hilit=letter+eisen

Regarding these statistics, this is very far from saying that 6.7% or 14% pts who have fasciculations (let alone those already diagnosed with BFS) were diagnosed with ALS in the future (these studies were performed on ALS pts, not BFS pts). Moreover, in his recent reply to Little Lost, Eisen himself wrote that it is extraordinarily rare for ALS to truly present with fasciculations and (in his opinion) if after 8 months there are no other clinical features then it is not ALS. Go figure!
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=19728
crotwich
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 58
Joined: July 31st, 2014, 5:33 am
Location: Europe

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Postby misterjuanperalta on November 10th, 2015, 10:12 am

misterjuanperalta
Saint
Saint
 
Posts: 515
Joined: August 21st, 2014, 7:27 am

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Postby crotwich on November 10th, 2015, 10:38 am

misterjuanperalta wrote:My information comes from here: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=21295&p=160169&hilit=+Eisen#p160169


Then I suggest you reread that topic (as well as the original studies), since you are spreading the wrong information. There was NO study mentioned there that x% of BFS pts progressed to ALS. On the other hand, the world's best specialists told us that such an x is very small.
crotwich
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 58
Joined: July 31st, 2014, 5:33 am
Location: Europe

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Postby misterjuanperalta on November 10th, 2015, 11:11 am

Great to know. Thank you for clearing it up. Funny how I get called out on the "wrong" information and get "silence" on the good information. Just saying.
misterjuanperalta
Saint
Saint
 
Posts: 515
Joined: August 21st, 2014, 7:27 am

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Postby crotwich on November 10th, 2015, 2:00 pm

MJP, FWIW I am grateful for your contributions and I am glad you found a possible explanation of your symptoms.
crotwich
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 58
Joined: July 31st, 2014, 5:33 am
Location: Europe

Re: Testing paradox for rare diseases

Sponsor

Sponsor
 


Return to General Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests