Moderators: JohnV, Arron, garym
Buzznerd123 wrote:@ghayes
I think it's better to not having it proven, if it's proven there is damage which might or might not be reversible.
No evidence means in my view that maybe this is reversible somehow.
Buzznerd123 wrote:@BFSburger
There's a flip side to not having anything proven with subjective symptoms being present, loss of credibility ...
It's hard to justify something that is not objective, invisible illness ...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests